The First Prosecution Witness, PW1, in the trial of
Halima Buba and Innocent Mbagwu on Friday, July 18,
2025 told Justice
Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja that
he received the sum of $12 million (Twelve Million Dollars) with the
involvement of defendants for transfer to Aisha Achimugu’s bank accounts.
Achimugu owns Ocean Gate Energy Oil and Gas,
whose account is domiciled in Zenith Bank Plc.
The witness, a bureau de change operator, while
been led in evidence by prosecution counsel Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, stated that
between March 10 and 24, 2025 he had received $12m from Aisha Achimugu as cash
swap in Abuja and Lagos branches of SunTrust Bank, adding that though he
has both naira and dollar accounts with the bank that “None of the
money went through my account.”
Testifying further, he said, “It was on social
media that I heard that Aisha Achimugu has been arrested and I forwarded it to
the first defendant. I can also recall that after meeting Aisha Achimugu, she
has also given me a total of $1.8 million for conversion into naira
and they were in tranches,” he said.
During cross-examination of the witness, defence
counsel, Johnson Usman, SAN, sought to tender some exhibits in
evidence that comprise the count charges, extra-judicial
statements of the witnesses and those of the defendants in the EFCC,
certificate of identification but failed due to the argument of the
prosecution that the defence ought to be more factual
by tendering the certified true copies of the exhibits it
wished to tender.
The prosecution counsel observed that, “The
documents from Page 10 to 12 can only be certified by the officer
of the EFCC. From Page 13 to 31 is a letter from SunTrust
Bank to the EFCC, forwarding account statements and account opening
documentation of Aisha Achimugu to the EFCC, it is only the officers
of the EFCC who received these documents that are in custody of the
original that can properly certify these documents, so they
cannot be tendered from the bar.”
Speaking further, Oyedepo said “My lord, from
Page 32 to 83 are extra-judicial statements of the defendant
to the EFCC and other witnesses to be called in this proceedings and
it is the EFCC that can certify these documents. The extra-judicial statements
of the various witnesses can only be tendered upon the satisfaction of the
condition enunciated in Section 232 of the Evidence Act. Also from Page 84 to
181 has been tendered as Exhibit P1, we submit that whereas Page 2 of the
documents, including Page 3 to 181 must be in substantial compliance with
Section 104 of the Evidence Act. There is no name of certified officer, no
designation, no evidence of payment of certified fees. I believe my lord that
what the tendering party intends to achieve is to turn my lord to a
forensic expert. I ask my learned brother to do the needful and I urge your
lordship to decline its admissibility,” he said
Justice Nwite adjourned the matter till October 16,
17, 2025 for ruling on the admissibility of exhibits and continuation
of the cross-examination.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,
EFCC is prosecuting both defendants, who are Managing
Director/Chief Executive and Chief Compliance Officer of SunTrust Bank
Ltd, and first and second defendants, respectively on a six-count
charge of money laundering to the tune of $12 million.
Comments:
Leave a Reply