Tuesday, April 28th 2026

The Battle of Lawyers: Aare Afe Babalola’s Defamation Petition Against Dele Farotimi


The Battle of Lawyers: Aare Afe Babalola’s Defamation Petition Against Dele Farotimi
430 views
    Share :

 

The Nigerian legal landscape has been rocked by a dramatic legal battle between two prominent lawyers, Aare Afe Babalola SAN and Dele Farotimi. At the center of this controversy is a petition filed by Babalola accusing Farotimi of criminal defamation. This case, addressed to the Commissioner of Police in Ekiti State, stems from allegations made in Farotimi’s book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System.

The dispute not only probes the thin line between free speech and defamation but also sheds light on ethical questions within Nigeria’s legal system.

The Context of the Dispute

The controversy originates from claims made by Farotimi regarding Babalola’s involvement in a high-profile legal case, Suit No. SC/146/2005: Major Muritala Gbadamosi Eletu & Ors v. H.R.H. Oba Tijani Akinloye & Ors. In the book, Farotimi alleges that Aare Afe Babalola and his firm, Afe Babalola & Co., manipulated the judiciary to secure a favorable outcome for their client. These allegations, published in the book and circulated across various platforms, have sparked significant backlash.

Key Allegations in the Petition

Aare Afe Babalola asserts that the claims made by Farotimi are false, malicious, and intended to tarnish his reputation. The petition highlights several statements from the book, including:

 • Judicial Corruption Allegation

 “That Aare Afe Babalola corrupted the Supreme Court to procure a fraudulent judgment in the service of his client.” (Page IX)

 • Compromising the Judiciary

 “Afe Babalola and the Eletus might have killed the buffalo but had no way from feeding from the carcass… The conspirators had it in hand and would extinguish the fire.” (Page 88)

 • Attacking Professional Integrity

 “Afe Babalola was imperial by the suit I filed in court. It was designed to blow open the tawdry details of his dirty deals with the Supreme Court.” (Page 85)

 • Questioning Court Integrity

 “The Supreme Court’s judgment was doctored by the confederation of lawyers in Afe Babalola’s chambers and the law offices of S.B Joseph & Co.” (Page 60)

 • Characterizing Babalola’s Influence

 “Afe is so enmeshed in his corruption that he has lost all sense of propriety and or fairness.” (Page 84)

Impact on Reputation and Profession

According to the petition, these statements have far-reaching consequences:

 • Client Withdrawal: Many clients have reportedly withdrawn from Babalola’s firm, undermining its financial stability.

 • Public Disdain: The allegations have sparked widespread criticism, especially within the legal community, tarnishing Babalola’s image as an esteemed legal luminary.

Aare Afe Babalola, known for his six-decade career marked by significant achievements, emphasizes the damage these allegations have done to his professional and personal reputation. He cites his involvement in landmark legal cases, the establishment of Afe Babalola University, and global recognition as evidence of his commitment to excellence and integrity in the legal profession.

Babalola’s Demands

In his petition, Babalola calls for:

 1. A Full Investigation: He urges authorities to investigate Farotimi’s claims and actions.

 2. Cease and Desist: An immediate stop to further distribution of the book.

 3. Recovery of Copies: A recall of all existing copies of the publication.

 4. Inquiry into Farotimi’s Conduct: An investigation into Farotimi’s admission of bypassing judicial procedures.

For Aare Afe Babalola, this is not just a fight to protect his legacy but also a stand to preserve the dignity of Nigeria’s judicial system. Whether the court sides with him or with Dele Farotimi, the outcome of this battle will undoubtedly leave a lasting imprint on Nigeria’s legal and literary landscape.

Meanwhile, the Ekiti State Chief Magistrates Court in the Ado Ekiti Division on Wednesday ordered Farotimi to be remanded in the state correctional center and adjourned the case to December 10, 202

Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *