The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has accused the
Senate of weakening public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral process over what
it described as unclear and conflicting positions on electronic transmission of
election results.
In a statement issued on Sunday, NLC President Joe
Ajaero said the labour union was deeply troubled by the confusion surrounding
the Senate’s amendment of the 2022 Electoral Act, particularly the provisions
relating to the transmission of results.
According to the NLC, the absence of a clear and
mandatory directive on electronic transmission poses a serious threat to
electoral transparency and public trust.
“Nigerians deserve a transparent system where votes
are not only counted but are seen to be counted,” the statement said.
The labour body noted that available records indicate
the Senate rejected a proposal that would have compelled the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC) to transmit results electronically in real
time, opting instead to retain a discretionary clause.
“This decision has generated widespread apprehension
across the country, and the explanations that followed have only deepened the
confusion,” the NLC said, warning that such legislative uncertainty could
entrench doubts within the electoral system at a critical post-2023 election
period.
The Congress demanded that the Senate immediately
issue a clear and official explanation detailing the exact provisions passed,
including the final wording of the bill and the reasoning behind the decision.
It also urged the leadership of the National Assembly
to ensure that the harmonisation process between the Senate and the House of
Representatives produces a final bill with unambiguous provisions.
“Any lack of clarity in the transmission and collation
of election results is a disservice to our democracy,” the NLC stated.
The labour union insisted that the amended Electoral
Act must expressly mandate INEC to transmit and collate results electronically
from polling units in real time. It warned that failure to include such a
provision could lead to nationwide protests or a boycott of future elections.
“Nigerian workers and citizens are watching closely,”
the statement added, stressing the need for clarity and integrity in electoral
legislation.
The warning follows the Senate’s passage of the
Electoral Act 2022 (Repeal and Re-enactment) Amendment Bill 2026, which scaled
third reading on February 4, 2026.
During deliberations, the upper chamber rejected a
proposed amendment to Clause 60(3) that sought to make electronic transmission
of results mandatory. The rejected clause would have required INEC presiding
officers to upload polling unit results to the IReV portal in real time after
signing and stamping result sheets.
Instead, the Senate retained the existing provision
that allows results to be transmitted “in a manner as prescribed by the
Commission,” effectively preserving INEC’s discretion over the process.
The decision sparked public backlash and criticism
from opposition parties and civil society groups, who argue that reliance on
discretionary or manual collation increases the risk of manipulation ahead of
the 2027 general elections.
The Senate’s position also differs from that of the
House of Representatives, which had earlier approved mandatory electronic
transmission. This discrepancy now necessitates a conference committee to
harmonise both versions of the bill before it is forwarded to President Bola
Tinubu for assent.
Responding to the controversy, Senate President
Godswill Akpabio said the Senate did not abolish electronic transmission of
results but merely removed the phrase “real time” to avoid legal and technical
complications.
According to him, the amendment gives INEC flexibility
to determine the most appropriate method of transmission in view of network
coverage and security concerns, while reaffirming the Senate’s commitment to
electoral reforms that reflect the will of Nigerians.
Beyond the disputed clause, the amendment bill also
introduces other reforms, including digital voter identification using QR codes
and tougher penalties for electoral offences.
Comments:
Leave a Reply