Convener of the Fight Against Corruption in the
Judiciary (FIACIJ), Mr Bayo Akinlade, has blamed overcrowding in the Nigerian
Custodial Centres on the “high-handedness” by some courts towards bail.
Akinlade told newsmen that where a court denies an
accused person bail for a bailable offence, then such judge or magistrate has
contributed to overcrowding the correctional centres.
According to him, the Administration of Criminal
Justice Act (ACJA) spells out the conditions for arrest and detention,
regretting that the conditions have often been ignored by the courts.
He, consequently, urged the judiciary to give true
meaning to the provisions of the ACJA and ensure that bail is not denied in
deserving cases.
“The provisions for arrest and detention are clear in
the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and Law.
“However, the courts often choose to ignore these
provisions, and by doing so, continue to allow the ‘gestapo’ method of arrest
by the police,” he said.
Akinlade noted that the 1999 constitution, which is
the grundnorm, provides that an accused is innocent until the court says
otherwise, thus necessitating the requirement for bail.
“We have laws that ensure that at the preliminary
stage of arrest, suspects are entitled to be treated as innocent until proven
guilty.
“This assumption continues even during and after
arraignment, hence the provision for bail,” he said.
He, however, noted that the lower courts often miss
the point of bail and, consequently, have ‘weaponised’ their discretion without
due regard to the damage caused by their decision.
Akinlade added that where suspects are
indiscriminately thrown into custody, it creates an imbalanced criminal justice
system, thereby often causing mental health issues for the affected
individuals.
“The essence of bail is simply to ensure that the
suspect attends to his case in court and there are certain conditions that are
laid down before the granting of bail,” he said.
Akinlade, consequently, urged the judiciary to ensure
that bail is strictly used as a means of ensuring attendance of a defendant in
court, rather than as a ‘weapon’ or punishment. (NAN)
Comments:
Leave a Reply