Social media critic Martins Vincent Otse, popularly
known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), has responded sharply to human rights lawyer and
Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Femi Falana following criticism of his
invitation to the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference in
Port Harcourt, Rivers State.
Falana had criticised the NBA’s decision to feature
VDM as a speaker on a national security panel titled “Known Gunmen or
Unknown Gunmen.”
Speaking during an interview with Channels Television,
the legal practitioner questioned VDM’s suitability for a discussion of such
importance, arguing that panels addressing national security should feature
individuals with demonstrable expertise in the country’s security architecture.
Falana also argued that NBA conferences should
primarily promote intellectual engagement and professional discourse rather
than entertainment.
Responding to the criticism, VDM accused Falana and
other members of the legal profession of exhibiting classism, suggesting that
their real objection was the presence of someone from an ordinary background at
a prestigious gathering traditionally associated with members of the elite.
According to VDM, his experience dealing with
security-related issues gives him a perspective that should not be dismissed
simply because he is not a conventional security expert.
He also questioned the effectiveness of some
recognised security professionals, particularly those involved in policies
concerning the rehabilitation and reintegration of suspected terrorists.
VDM argued that security issues should concern
everyone and said practical experience should be considered alongside academic
or professional credentials.
Turning his attention to the legal profession, the
social media critic challenged the description of law as a “noble profession,”
arguing that public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system has declined.
He questioned why many Nigerians increasingly turn to
social media personalities and activists when seeking justice rather than
relying solely on the courts.
VDM further accused some lawyers and other
professionals of failing to speak out strongly enough on issues affecting
Nigerians, including the reported abduction of judges and allegations of
corruption within the justice system.
He maintained that his record of activism and
interventions in various cases demonstrated his contribution to society, while
challenging his critics to point to similar achievements.
VDM also defended his invitation to the NBA
conference, arguing that discussions about national security should not be
restricted to established professionals and that ordinary citizens who have
experienced insecurity firsthand also have valuable perspectives to contribute.
The controversy has generated debate over the NBA’s
decision to invite VDM, with the disagreement highlighting broader questions
about expertise, professional gatekeeping, public participation and the role of
social media activists in discussions on national issues.
Comments:
Leave a Reply