Justice
Balkisu Bello Aliyu of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, has affirmed
the power of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to
investigate and prosecute cases of tax evasion and other tax-related
issues.
She gave the
ruling in Abuja in a unanimous judgment of three Justices: Balkisu Bello Aliyu,
Adebukunola Banjoko and Okon Efreki Abang.
The
judge set aside the judgment of the trial judge, Justice
Taiwo . O. Taiwo of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that the EFCC
“ has no statutory power to cause investigation on tax evasion. The trial
judge also ruled that the Commission cannot extend its
investigation of money laundering to tax evasion, being the predicate offence.
The
judgment of the trial court originated from the suit of Insurance Resourcery
and Consultancy Service Limited that dragged the EFCC to court for
inviting and investigating its officials for tax evasion, claiming that the
Commission lacked the competence and legal right to do so. The company relied
on several Sections of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, FIRS, Act to make
its claims.
Dissatisfied
with the judgment of the trial court, the EFCC approached the Appellate
court relying on Section 46 of its Act and asking for the setting aside
of the judgment of the trial court on five grounds of appeal. One
of the grounds is whether the trial court was right when it held that the
Commission lacked statutory power to invite or investigate Resourcery and
Consultancy Service Limited for money laundering which has tax evasion as
a predicate offence.
In her
ruling, Justice Aliyu held that the learned trial judge erred
in holding that the EFCC “has no power to investigate tax evasion in view of
Section 46 of the EFCC Act. Further, since the FIRS Act
itself specifically provides and supports collaboration between the
FIRS and the EFCC and other Government Agencies in the
investigation and enforcement of tax evasion, it followed that the
above finding of the trial court that the Appellant cannot extend its
investigation of money laundering to tax evasion as a predicate offence is not
supported by law and therefore wrong and I so hold”.
The
judge also set aside other issues for determination in favour of the EFCC,
stressing that “ having resolved the two issues for determination in favour of
the Appellant means that the appeal is meritorious and it is allowed by me.
Consequently, the judgment of the Federal High Court, sitting in Abuja,
delivered on 28th July 2022 by Hon. Justice Taiwo. O. TAIWO IN
Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/457/2022 is set aside in its entirety”.
Comments:
Leave a Reply