Friday, April 24th 2026

Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Stalled as NMA Fails to Submit Medical Report – Court Reschedules to October 16


Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Stalled as NMA Fails to Submit Medical Report – Court Reschedules to October 16
135 views
    Share :

The trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was on Tuesday adjourned after the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) failed to present its medical report on his health status before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

At the previous sitting, Justice James Omotosho had directed the NMA President to set up a board of medical experts to assess Kanu’s reported deteriorating health condition. The court also ordered the board to determine whether the medical facilities at the Department of State Services (DSS) detention center were adequate for his treatment or if he should be transferred to a private ward at the National Hospital, Abuja.

The report was also expected to state whether Kanu is fit to continue standing trial.

During Tuesday’s proceedings, counsel for the Federal Government, Suraj S’aad, informed the court that the NMA board had contacted the prosecution team to explain that the report was not yet ready for submission.

S’aad then requested a one-week adjournment to allow the board conclude its findings and submit the report. With no objection from the defense, Justice Omotosho granted the application and adjourned the matter to October 16 for the NMA to present its report.

Kanu is currently facing a seven-count terrorism charge filed by the Department of State Services (DSS). On September 26, the same court dismissed Kanu’s “no-case submission,” ruling that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence linking him to alleged acts of terrorism.

Justice Omotosho held that the prosecution’s exhibits and testimony raised substantial allegations requiring Kanu to open his defense. The judge emphasized that Kanu must also be given the opportunity to present evidence regarding his claim of extraordinary rendition, in line with his constitutional right to a fair hearing.

 

Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *