Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Attorney-General of the
Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF), said the declaration of a state of
emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu was a ‘compromise’ to
prevent the impeachment of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof.
Ngozi Odu.
Fagbemi said this on Wednesday while addressing State
House Correspondents after a meeting with President Bola Tinubu.
“Don’t forget there was a notice of impeachment from
the House of Assembly. If that impeachment had been allowed to take its full
course, then the governor would have lost entirely and completely.
“So, in a way, if you say it’s a compromise, I will
agree.
“If the impeachment process had continued, in the end
would have seen both the governor and the deputy governor out of office for the
remainder of the four-year term,” he said.
Fagbemi said towards the end of 2023, things had not
been going on well to the extent that the governor took the law into his hands
and demolished the House of Assembly building.
“Don’t forget
the role of the House of Assembly.
“They are the lawmakers, they are to consider budget,
they are to pass budget, they are also to be approached in matters of
appointment of commissioners for ratification and all other things; they are to
do oversight functions.
“Since that happened, things have not been the same at
all. In a community of 32, you expect that at least 15 or 16 will be there to
do the job.
“The governor constituted about three or four of the
members into the House of Assembly, gave them preferential treatment and moved
them to the government house to be performing legislative functions,” said the
minister.
He said the situation got to the court, and that at
the end of the day, the Supreme Court made very profound findings of breaches
of the constitution against the governor.
He said the court came to the decision that the
governor had long anticipated, wrongly, that he might be impeached.
“He knew that the House of Assembly is a critical
organ to do that, so he brought down the House of Assembly.
“There was no effort to rebuild the House of Assembly
after 14 months. The government stands on a tripod: the executive, the
legislature and the judiciary.
“He made the functioning of government impossible. It
is not enough for the executive to say we are spending money. Even the money
you want to spend must have been appropriated for by the House of Assembly,”
said the AGF.
He said the Supreme Court came to a decision that the
behaviour of the governor was like a despot, and that there was no government
in Rivers State.
“What further
evidence do we need? So, the stage was set, but no action was taken immediately
in the expectation or hope that good sense would prevail.
“It was expected that the governor would create an
enabling environment, and that the House of Assembly too would be reasonable
enough to ensure that the people of Rivers enjoyed dividends of democracy.
“We are in a democracy. There was, what I would call
telegraphing of the militants by the governor, and the reason I said so was
when he beckoned to them that he would let them know when it was time to act,”
said Fagbemi.
He stated that a week after, the militants swung into
action by vandalising pipelines, and that the governor did not come out to
disown them.
“Don’t also forget that when this government came into
office, Nigeria was producing about 900,000 barrels of oil a day. With the
efforts and the ingenuity that the President had, he ensured that the
production rose to about 1.5 million barrel per day.
“That’s about 45 per cent increase. Governors were
smiling home at the end of the month with about 60 per cent increase in their
take home to their various states.
“Then somebody rose or encouraged or became inactive
when he was supposed to act. There was not a word dissuading the militants who
issued the threat,” said Fagbemi.
He said Nigeria still relied largely on oil, and for
anyone to touch the oil pipelines, he must be viewed not only as an enemy of
Rivers, but an enemy of Nigeria.
“All the 36
states share what comes in from the production of oil. And I believe that the
decision of Mr President is anchored on the decision of the Supreme Court.
“The second one is the inability of those involved,
both the House of Assembly and the governor, from being able to create an
enabling environment for the people of rivers to enjoy the dividends of
democracy.
“Then the security situation in that place. If he had
waited maybe a day longer, only God knows what would have followed,” he said.
Comments:
Leave a Reply